While GCL is in Colombia making peace with grandma, James will be running some oldies but goodies for your reading pleasure.
Original Post Date: October 8, 2006
Here are two people who are single-handedly undoing the course of progress and acceptance in America:
Michelle Malkin and Jim McGreevey suck. *Pun sorta intended.
Michelle Malkin is all sorts of pissed off at the New York Times because they mentioned the fact that she's Filipina. Yes, Michelle Malkin, nee Maglalang, that tank-top wearing, caramel-skinned Conservative sell-out is crying foul after reporter Virginia Heffernan mentioned the pundit's ethnicity in an article about Malkin's attack on YouTube.
Says Malkin: I love how the always oh-so-sensitive New York Times has no problem throwing my ethnicity into an attack, when my ethnicity has nothing at all to do with the subject (the jihad vs. anti-jihad war at YouTube).
Here's why Malkin's etnicity matters:
-- Malkin has done everything in her power to whitewash herself.
-- Her psyhotic desire to belong to the "winning" team has her screaming like a banshee for a cause that undermines the very values that have allowed a woman of color to become such a visible figure in our society.
--She boasts on her blog: [I] opposed publisher [of Seattle Times] and supported successful campaign to abolish race-based affirmative action in government hiring, contracting, and college admissions.
-- Her book In Defense of Internment draws psychotic parallels between the internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII and the need for similar actions with Arab Americans today.
Among other hallucinations, the book claims to expose "how both Japanese American and Arab/Muslim American leaders have united to undermine America's safety."
I would dare say that Michelle Malkin is the Jenna Jameson of the Conservative movement. Here you have a woman of color begging to have her race stripped of her while she whores off her wit and intelligence to advance the cause of the Republican party.
What a godsend she is to the white Republican establishment -- to have one of the little brown ones speak out against affirmative action and espouse the homophobic and xenophobic ideals of their party.
Kudos to Virginia Heffernan for pointing out Malkin's most egregious trespass -- that which she has perpetrated on herself and her heritage by becoming a puppet for a slowly dying cause.
***
So what's my beef with Jim McGreevey?
To hear him speak about his newfound "truth" is like watching a man possessed by Pat Buchanan and George Michael. Every utterance out of McGreevey's mouth as he promotes his new book The Confession, especially his embarassing, vomit-inducing appearance on Oprah, reveal a man still struggling with a major identity crisis.
I can't even applaud him coming out of the closet. Jim McGreevey didn't say he was gay, he revealed himself to be a depraved, co-dependant, lying son-of-a-bitch, who like Michelle Malkin was all too eager to sell his own people out just "to belong."
He told Oprah that even though he marched in Gay Pride parades, he refused to vote in favor of gay marriage out of fear that he would be outed. He went into detail about his trysts behind a Synogauge (DAYS before Rosh Hoshanna no less, OY the timing!), he said he had a penchant for anonymous sex with truck drivers, and that he met "the love of his life" in an Israeli whom he would later sleep with in his wife's bed while she was holed up in a hospital recuperating from a Cesaerian section.
WTF?!!!!
This isn't truth or liberation, this is a twisted man who is still acting out of homophobia. WHERE THE HELL ARE ROSIE AND ELLEN to distract America's attention from this wacko fag?
To make matters worse, McGreevey invited Oprah's cameras to his new home which he shares with his "life partner" of six hours (or months).
James and I were flipping out while we watched, in horror, how this idiot confirmed Middle America's worst fears about gays:
-- That we're whores
-- That we lie
-- That we ruin families
-- That we're self possessed and only out for own satisfaction
As I think about topics to write about on this blog, and as I question its effectiveness, I am thankful for the example provided to me by Michelle and Jim. Unless I speak out as a gay person of color, the only point of view this country is going to hear is that of these two self-hating loons. I can't let that happen.
GCL -
ReplyDeleteWoops...let's try that again.
ReplyDeleteGCL - It's been a while, and I can see you're still up to your old tricks.
There is simply nobody - nobody - who I have read - online, in print, on television, who has a more racist, condescending and self-indulgent view of Michelle Malkin as you do. I hardly agree with her most of the time, but she is a FREE-THINKING individual who is not RESTRAINED BY RACIAL GROUP THINK? Do you understand this? That means, despite what you think her opinions SHOULD be, being that she is "BROWN", she thinks otherwise and is willing to break from the pack, and endure all sorts of death threats and racist labels to say what she truly believes.
GCL - it is people like you who think they're "progressive" but who, in reality, think that every race should stay in the same ideological pen. That's not progressive. It's bigotry.
Finally someone is telling the truth about Michelle. She can't stand being Filipino and then condemns anyone else who thinks like she does. She's never the racist one but everyone else is. Out of this self-hatred comes voluminous amounts of scathing criticism for anyone who is like her. Finally...thanks.
ReplyDelete